Back to search
2112.02939

State Observation of Affine-in-the-States Systems with Unknown Time-Varying Parameters and Output Delay

Alexey Bobtsov, Nikolay Nikolaev, Romeo Ortega, Denis Efimov, Olga Kozachek

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

Proposition 4 in the paper states the PEBO+DREM observer with the first-order filters, adjugate mixing, gradient law, and the clipped fixed-time transform, and proves fixed-time exact recovery under the IE condition together with boundedness of all signals; the candidate solution reproduces the same construction and error analysis step-by-step, adding minor clarifications (e.g., explicitly showing Y=Ωθ from the filtered regressions via zero initial conditions and a slightly sharper statement that the first threshold-crossing time tc satisfies tc ≤ tIE). Small notational mismatches (n+q vs n+k; reuse of Y) and the implicit zero-initialization of the filters are the only issues; they do not affect correctness. Hence both are correct and essentially the same proof .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

A careful check confirms the PEBO+DREM observer and its fixed-time convergence under an IE condition are correctly derived. The proof is standard for DREM-based designs and is technically sound. The work targets a specific but relevant class (delayed output, time-varying parameters) and delivers an exact, fixed-time recovery—valuable when the delay is known. Minor clarifications (filter initial conditions, notation, and the relation between tc and tIE) would improve readability but do not affect correctness.