2111.14230
Hölder regularity for collapses of point vortices
Martin Donati, Ludovic Godard-Cadillac
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves 1/(α+1)-Hölder rates at vortex collapse in the plane (Theorem 1.3) and a 1/2-Hölder rate in bounded domains under an interior-adherence hypothesis (Theorem 1.4), via a cluster decomposition and a quantitative “no-collapse-too-fast” criterion (Proposition 2.4) that implies a minimal-time barrier comparable to η^{α+1} for shrinking separations. These results and their proofs are internally consistent and carefully track the role of non-neutrality and boundary effects. The candidate’s plane-case argument reproduces the 1/(α+1) rate through a clean Dini-derivative bound for the minimal separation and is essentially correct. However, for bounded domains the candidate omits the crucial hypothesis that the collapsing vortex has an interior adherence point and incorrectly treats the smooth harmonic terms as uniformly Lipschitz with constants depending only on Ω and the intensities; the paper shows that ∇_xγ_Ω can blow up like 1/dist(x,∂Ω), and therefore the bounded “forcing” reduction requires staying away from the boundary. The paper explicitly builds this into the statement and proof of Theorem 1.4, whereas the model’s statement would be false without that interior-distance control. See Theorem 1.3 and its use of Proposition 2.4 for the plane-case rate, and Theorem 1.4 plus the decomposition/estimates for the bounded domain case .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The results are correct, optimally sharp, and presented with the appropriate assumptions. The methodology—quantitative control of collapse speed via cluster analysis and a barrier argument—is robust. The bounded-domain treatment carefully isolates interior adherence to control the harmonic remainders, and the Appendix gives explicit self-similar collapses corroborating optimal rates.