Back to search
2111.13037

LEARNING DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS FROM DATA: A SIMPLE CROSS-VALIDATION PERSPECTIVE, PART III: IRREGULARLY-SAMPLED TIME SERIES

Jonghyeon Lee, Edward De Brouwer, Boumediene Hamzi, Houman Owhadi

incompletemedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper defines the regular and time-aware formulations (models (1) and (7)), recalls the Kernel Flows criterion ρ and the pointwise RKHS error bound σ, and presents convincing experiments, but it does not supply formal proofs connecting (7) versus (1) in terms of hypothesis-class inclusion, best-achievable in-sample error, pointwise error bounds, or minimized ρ. Those four items are precisely what the model’s solution establishes under clear kernel-family assumptions (not stated in the paper): (i) that Θ7 contains a Δ-nulling embedding of Θ1; and (ii) optional sufficient conditions for σ7≤σ1. The paper’s statements of (1), (6), (7), the KF objective (5)/(16)–(17), and the local bound (18) are correct as recalled, but the paper does not prove the comparison claims that the model addresses. Hence the paper is incomplete on these theoretical fronts, while the model’s solution is correct under its stated hypotheses (and does not contradict the paper’s empirical findings) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

A simple, well-motivated adaptation of Kernel Flows to irregular sampling is demonstrated convincingly on benchmark chaotic systems. The method is practical and yields strong empirical improvements. To strengthen the paper, the authors should clarify their kernel parameterization on the extended input and add short remarks linking standard RKHS/KF theory to the observed gains. These are minor revisions that would enhance rigor and reproducibility without altering the core contributions.