2111.12377
SLIDING MOTION ON TANGENTIAL SETS OF FILIPPOV SYSTEMS
Tiago Carvalho, Douglas D. Novaes, Durval J. Tonon
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The candidate’s proof reconstructs the paper’s Theorem 3: after φ-regularization, one can rewrite the dynamics as a singular perturbation problem possessing a slow manifold Stan diffeomorphic to M, and the reduced flow restricted to Stan is conjugate to the tangential sliding vector field Ztan. The paper proves this by straightening (h,η), rescaling x_n/ε, and constructing Stan = {(u,0,w*(u))} (with w*(u)=φ^{-1}(λ*(u,0,0))) and a direct conjugacy, whereas the candidate augments with a fast auxiliary variable λ to render the graph λ=φ(h/ε) invariant and then performs a slow-time reduction; both routes yield the same reduced dynamics under the same hypothesis 〈dηZ+,dηZ−〉=−‖dηZ+‖‖dηZ−‖≠0 on M. The statements and constructions match the paper’s definitions and Theorem 3 and its proof structure (Definition 1–2, Theorem 1, Definition 3, and Section 4) .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
Both the paper and the candidate demonstrate a correct equivalence between the tangential sliding vector field and the reduced flow of a suitably regularized singularly perturbed system near a tangential manifold M. The candidate uses an augmented fast variable λ to enforce invariance of the regularization graph and then reduces; the paper uses coordinate straightening and direct rescaling of x\_n/ε. The conclusions coincide, and assumptions match. Minor clarifications on time reparametrization scope and explicit identification of slow-set conditions would improve clarity.