2111.10225
Marginally Unstable Discrete-Time Linear Switched Systems with Highly Irregular Trajectory Growth
Ian D. Morris
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Theorem 1 rigorously via a two-step strategy: (i) an explicit analysis of special rational angles θ (Theorem 2) yielding either uniform boundedness (marginal stability) or linear growth (marginal instability) of all products for those θ, and (ii) a Baire-category argument which assembles these dense ingredients into the dense Gδ set Ω of Theorem 1, together with a linear-algebraic construction of the exceptional subspace W of dimension ≤ 3. Key technical pillars include: the block-upper-triangular decomposition and a subadditive translation-column functional whose limit exists (Theorem 2(i)) , the identity A1^q = I for a suitable choice of A1 parameters when θ = pπ/q with p even and related geometric estimates that give uniform boundedness across all words (Theorem 2(iii)) , and the continuity/Gδ constructions that yield Ω1, Ω2, and hence Ω, together with the vector-space argument that produces W of dimension at most 3 (proof of Theorem 1) . In contrast, the candidate model’s core bound—asserting a uniform-in-words estimate along convergent denominators q_n based on Denjoy–Koksma/continued fractions—never actually controls the supremum over all words. Specifically, the claimed reduction to a bound of the form max_{|w|=T} ||s(w)|| ≤ C(λ,θ)(||c0||+||c1||)[1 + T||I−R_θ^T||] suppresses an unavoidable linear-in-T contribution coming from many short 1-blocks; the suggested “telescoping” of 0-block contributions does not occur unless c0 and c1 are cohomologous with the same transfer function (the paper’s W-like exceptional case), and even then the interleaving of B1 blocks obstructs a simple telescoping. The paper never relies on such a (false) DK-type uniform bound; instead it proves boundedness at rational angles and uses continuity/Baire methods to reach Ω. Therefore, the paper’s argument is complete and correct, whereas the model’s solution is incomplete and relies on an unjustified, and in general false, uniform estimate.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The paper gives a clean counterexample framework demonstrating highly irregular maximal growth in marginally unstable discrete-time switched systems, disproving a conjecture and clarifying limits of polynomial-growth heuristics. The proofs are solid: an explicit rational-angle analysis, continuity-based Gδ constructions, and careful linear-algebraic bounds. Minor enhancements to exposition would further aid readers, but the results are correct and of interest to the switched systems and JSR communities.