2110.07755
Multi-Stage Sparse Resource Allocation for Control of Spreading Processes over Networks
Vera L. J. Somers, Ian R. Manchester
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s core convexification idea—splitting 1 − hδ into (1 − hΔ) + h(Δ − δ) and mapping the DP inequalities pk ≥ C + α pk+1 Ak into log-sum-exp constraints via y = log p and logarithmic resource transforms—is sound and matches Proposition 2’s sketch. However, the stated convex program contains serious typographical/semantic errors: (i) bounds (23)–(24) incorrectly use 1 − δ instead of Δ − δ and omit the reference bars, and (ii) the persistence relations “βk = β1 − Σ u” and “δk = δ1 − Σ v” are dimensionally wrong; the correct relations are multiplicative, βk = β̄k e−u/w and Δ − δk = (Δ − δ̄k) e−v/w. These mistakes make the written statement incomplete as an exact equivalence. The candidate solution corrects these issues, proves both directions, and establishes convexity carefully. See the paper’s DP relaxation and LSE constraints (equations (7)–(8), (20)–(21)) and Proposition 2 statement for the intended result, and note the problematic lines in the proposition as printed .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The submission advances a practical, scalable convex framework for dynamic sparse resource allocation in spreading processes, building on a positive-systems DP relaxation. The main conceptual step—diagonal splitting and logarithmic transforms to LSE constraints—is valuable. However, the central proposition as printed contains material errors in the transformed-variable bounds and in the persistence relations, which undermines formal correctness. With these corrected and a brief rigorous equivalence proof added, the work would be a solid contribution.