Back to search
2110.05989

Furstenberg’s Times 2, Times 3 Conjecture (a Short Survey)

Matan Tal

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The uploaded survey states Rudolph’s theorem precisely and gives several correct proofs or proof sketches, including a clean derivation of Rudolph from Host’s theorem via ergodic decomposition and averaging q^k-pushforwards of the ×p-ergodic components with positive entropy (see the paragraph “Before presenting the proof, let us see why Host’s theorem implies Rudolph’s theorem” in Section 5) , and records the entropy proportionality (Proposition 3.1) ensuring positivity for all generators once one has it for some r ∈ ⟨p,q⟩ . By contrast, the model’s Step 2 incorrectly asserts that pushing ×p-ergodic components forward by ×q preserves their ×p-entropy, and then concludes that almost every ×p-ergodic component has positive ×p-entropy. Entropy is non-increasing under factor maps, so this step is not justified. The model consequently relies on pointwise equidistribution for μ-a.e. x, which it has not established, instead of the measure-level averaging argument used in the paper. Therefore the paper’s argument is correct, while the model’s proof contains a substantive gap.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

This survey accurately presents the positive-entropy landscape for the ×p,×q problem, with correct statements and coherent proof sketches. The reduction of Rudolph from Host is particularly well-presented. Minor editorial clarifications would further strengthen readability and guard against common misinterpretations (e.g., entropy behavior under factor maps).