2109.14564
Discrepancy and Rectifiability of Almost Linearly Repetitive Delone Sets
Yotam Smilansky, Yaar Solomon
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves exactly the target bound: for an ε-linearly repetitive Delone set Λ (with ε < r_Λ) there exist μ, α, δ > 0 such that for every axis-aligned box B, |#(Λ ∩ B) − μ·vol(B)| ≤ α·vol(B)/ℓ(B)^δ (Theorem 1.2) . It obtains this via a general uniform-averaging result for ε-weight distributions (Theorem 2.2) and then specializes to the counting weight w(B)=#(Λ∩B), which is an ε-weight distribution for any 0<ε<r_Λ (Proof of Theorem 1.2) . The proof develops a scale-contraction recursion for squarish boxes and extends to general boxes by partitioning into boxes of width ℓ(B), yielding the same decay rate in ℓ(B) (end of Theorem 2.2 proof) . The candidate’s solution follows the Lagarias–Pleasants scheme too—defining a local/weight distribution, proving a contraction across scales, and then passing from cubes to boxes—but implements two distinct proof devices: (i) a Vitali-type selection of many disjoint ε-copies across scales, whereas the paper takes a single interior copy plus a partition and derives a clean contraction on µ⁺−µ⁻ (cf. the inequalities culminating in Δ(C₂t) ≤ (1−C₁−C̄₁)Δ(t)+const·t⁻¹) ; and (ii) a Whitney-type cube decomposition, while the paper uses a simpler partition into boxes of side ℓ(B) to control the boundary term and sum the cubic estimates . Both arguments are sound and deliver the same discrepancy conclusion, hence the verdict.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The paper provides a robust extension of LP-type discrepancy to almost linearly repetitive settings and leverages it to deduce rectifiability and to rule out almost linear repetitivity for important tiling classes. The methods are careful adaptations of known techniques with clear advances; only minor clarifications would enhance accessibility.