2109.14190
Oncolytic virotherapy for tumours following a Gompertz growth law
Adrianne L. Jenner, Peter S. Kim, Federico Frascoli
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Jacobian and characteristic polynomials at (K,0,0) and at the positive equilibrium match the candidate’s, yielding the same stability threshold γ=1 for the ineffective-treatment equilibrium (their Eq. (8)) and the same cubic for the partial-eradication equilibrium (their Eq. (9)) . The candidate then applies the standard cubic Routh–Hurwitz test in normalized form and gives an explicit Hopf condition via Δ(ξ)=a1a2−a3 with a1,a2,a3>0 and transversality from Δ′≠0, while the paper identifies Hopf (and GH) loci and bistability numerically with AUTO/XPPAUT and continuation plots . On the full-eradication equilibrium, the paper defers to numerics due to a singular Jacobian, whereas the candidate notes invariance of the U=0 face and linear decay of (I,V) there—an analytically valid complement to the paper’s discussion .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The core analytical derivations (equilibria, Jacobians, characteristic polynomials) and the qualitative bifurcation structure (Hopf, GH points, bistability) are correct and mutually consistent with the candidate’s solution. Minor clarifications would improve rigor: explicitly present the normalized Routh–Hurwitz conditions and briefly explain the analytic structure at the origin U=0 (invariance and linear stability of the (I,V)-subsystem there).