Back to search
2109.08785

Quantitative Destruction of Invariant Circles

Lin Wang

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper establishes r < 3 + μ (μ-well approximable ω) and, for badly approximable ω and r ∈ [0,3), the degree bound N ≤ C ε^{-3/(2(3−r))}, by a two-part perturbation (un + vn), an explicit lower bound for the Peierls barrier at small frequencies, and a scaling lemma reducing general ω to small frequency; all key steps are proved or referenced in-app (e.g., the construction, barrier estimates, and scaling transfer) . The model’s outline reaches the same conclusions but follows a different path: it invokes a general modulus-of-continuity in ρ and rational-approximation transfer not used in the paper, and it heuristically postulates a barrier lower bound with a 3/2-exponent; these choices are plausible but not the paper’s route and are partially mis-cited. Overall, statements match; proofs differ.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

A focused, technically competent contribution to converse KAM for twist maps, giving quantitative destruction thresholds in terms of arithmetic properties, smoothness, and degree of trigonometric perturbations. The methods are standard-but-subtle (Peierls barrier, minimal configurations, analytic approximation), organized cleanly with appendices for key steps. Minor expository clarifications would further improve accessibility, but the core results and proofs appear solid.