Back to search
2108.11045

Reachability of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Dynamics

Taha Shafa, Melkior Ornik

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 4 proves that the proxy control system ẋ = a + UΛ(‖x‖)u with λ_i(s) = max{ g(s)/(α(s)‖G(0)†η_i‖ + β(s)), g(s), 0 } has reachable set R̂(T,x0) contained in the guaranteed reachable set RG(T,x0), by embedding a polygon P(S(x)) inside the guaranteed velocity set VGx and invoking Proposition 1. The candidate solution establishes the same inclusion by showing the pointwise velocity-set inclusion a + UΛ(‖x‖)u ∈ f̂(x) + Ĝ(x)B_m(0;1) for every consistent (f̂,Ĝ), using Weyl-type singular-value bounds, pseudoinverse perturbation bounds with a shape constant μ, and a minimal-norm control construction; this matches the paper’s construction and constants and reaches the same conclusion. Apart from minor clarity issues (notation for the input subspace and a typographical “‖G(0)†‖ vs ‖G(0)†‖−1” in the domain bound), the arguments are consistent.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript develops a rigorous and practically motivated framework for underapproximating guaranteed reachable sets of nonlinear control-affine systems with unknown dynamics from local information. The main contributions (ball and convex direction-dependent underapproximations of the guaranteed velocity set leading to proxy control systems) are sound and well supported by analysis and examples. A few presentation issues (minor typographical inconsistency in the radius bound, and clarifications on the proxy input subspace and measurability) can be addressed with light edits. Overall, the work is correct and of solid interest to specialists in reachability and safety of uncertain systems.