2108.10691
Measuring chaos in the Lorenz and Rössler models: Fidelity tests for reservoir computing.
James Scully, Alexander Neiman, Andrey Shilnikov
incompletehigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines simple binary partitions for Lorenz (flip–flop at x′=0 by wing) and Rössler (z-max threshold) and empirically shows that source entropy h_m, LZ, and Markov transitions detect stability windows (vanishing on periodic orbits) and broadly track a normalized Lyapunov rate across parameter sweeps; it also validates RC surrogates using z_max return maps with the canonical cusp at r≈28 and the loss of expansion at higher r. These claims are documented and consistent within the paper’s computational scope, but not proved as theorems and rely on non-generating partitions and finite-N corrections . The model’s solution agrees on core points (periodic windows ⇒ h=0 and LZ→0; rational, constant Markov matrices; qualitative return-map checks) and adds reasonable theoretical context (LZ consistency, Ruelle inequality). However, it overstates some results with quantified guarantees (e.g., asserting strictly positive cross-parameter correlations and sup-norm return-map closeness implying persistence/exclusion of periodic points) that require stronger hypotheses than given in the paper and are not established there. Hence, both are incomplete: the paper is empirically correct but not formally proved; the model is largely correct conceptually but includes claims that exceed what is supported.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The paper presents a clear, well-executed study leveraging simple symbolic partitions to quantify chaoticity in Lorenz and Rössler systems via block entropies, Lempel–Ziv complexity, Markov transitions, and a normalized Lyapunov rate, and it uses return maps to validate RC surrogates. The results convincingly demonstrate stability-window detection and sensible cross-measure behavior, with appropriate caveats about non-generating partitions and finite-sample estimation. To strengthen the manuscript, the authors should temper phrasing that might imply rigorous equivalences, clarify estimator definitions and normalizations, and more explicitly discuss limitations where LE diverges from symbolic measures.