Back to search
2108.00546

FEAR-DRIVEN EXTINCTION AND (DE)STABILIZATION IN A PREDATOR-PREY MODEL INCORPORATING PREY HERD BEHAVIOR AND MUTUAL INTERFERENCE

Kwadwo Antwi-Fordjour, Rana D. Parshad, Hannah E. Thompson, Stephanie B. Westaway

incompletemedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 5.1 (fear-driven finite-time extinction for some k>0, starting from initial data that converges to a stable coexistence equilibrium when k=0) is plausibly true, but its proof contains substantive gaps and inconsistent inequalities (e.g., replacing −bu^2 by −u^2, using an unproved upper bound u≤a to obtain a^2/(kv), and introducing a time-dependent bound that is then used uniformly in T*). The candidate model solution provides a rigorous, constructive sufficient condition and an explicit k via a standard sublinear change of variables z=u^{1−p}, but it only guarantees extinction under quantitative constraints relating (u0,v0) and parameters; it does not establish the paper’s stronger existence claim for arbitrary such initial data. Hence, the paper’s argument is incomplete, and the model’s solution, while mathematically correct as a sufficient criterion, is also incomplete relative to the paper’s stated claim.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The topic is interesting and the numerical exploration extensive, but the central analytical result (Theorem 5.1) has significant proof gaps: inconsistent handling of coefficients, unproved bounds, and quantifier issues in the contradiction argument. A corrected, fully rigorous proof is needed, or the claim should be reframed with explicit quantitative hypotheses.