2107.11962
On Hyperbolic Sets of Polynomials
Genadi Levin, Feliks Przytycki
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves Theorem 1.1 (J∞ contains no hyperbolic sets) by an accessibility-and-angles argument together with a combinatorial lemma for the doubling map, culminating in a contradiction via preimage-counting in continua; the proof is complete and self-contained. The model’s proposed proof is not sound as written: it crucially invokes an unproven assumption that each renormalization F_n is persistently recurrent and that ω(F_n,0) is a minimal set (a nontrivial Lyubich result whose applicability here is neither justified nor shown to hold for all infinitely renormalizable maps), and it also contains a logical misstep when deducing ω(f,0) ⊂ ⋃_j f^j(J_n). Without these, the model’s argument does not go through.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The paper gives a complete, unconditional proof that J∞ contains no hyperbolic sets for infinitely renormalizable quadratic polynomials, using a clear combination of accessibility (via external rays) and a combinatorial maximality property for the doubling map. The argument is technically sound and avoids heavier machinery such as persistently recurrent minimality or Mañé–Sad–Sullivan. The result is natural, sits well within current interests around renormalization and local connectivity, and is presented with sufficient clarity and detail to be checked.