Back to search
2107.07152

Dead zones and phase reduction of coupled oscillators

Peter Ashwin, Christian Bick, Camille Poignard

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Proposition 3 states that if N(Ẑ) and N(ĝin) each contain an interval of lengths L1 and L2, and L1+L2>2π, then the averaged coupling h(ϑ) = (1/2π)∫ Ẑ(ϑ+s) ĝin(s) ds has a nontrivial dead zone of length at least L1+L2−2π; the proof sketch argues by shifting one zero-arc to cover the complement of the other so the integrand vanishes for all s and hence h(ϑ)=0 on an interval of ϑ (Proposition 3 and equation (13) in the uploaded PDF) . The candidate solution gives exactly this geometric-shift/convolution argument in full detail—including an explicit construction via a lift to R and a length calculation of the shift set J, yielding |J|=L1+L2−2π—thereby matching the paper’s claim and filling in the omitted details. No substantive contradiction found.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

Proposition 3 is correct and its geometric idea is compelling. The current proof sketch is terse; including a short construction of the interval of shifts and its length would materially improve readability and remove any ambiguity. The result is well-placed in the paper’s narrative and directly supports later applications.