2107.07152
Dead zones and phase reduction of coupled oscillators
Peter Ashwin, Christian Bick, Camille Poignard
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Proposition 3 states that if N(Ẑ) and N(ĝin) each contain an interval of lengths L1 and L2, and L1+L2>2π, then the averaged coupling h(ϑ) = (1/2π)∫ Ẑ(ϑ+s) ĝin(s) ds has a nontrivial dead zone of length at least L1+L2−2π; the proof sketch argues by shifting one zero-arc to cover the complement of the other so the integrand vanishes for all s and hence h(ϑ)=0 on an interval of ϑ (Proposition 3 and equation (13) in the uploaded PDF) . The candidate solution gives exactly this geometric-shift/convolution argument in full detail—including an explicit construction via a lift to R and a length calculation of the shift set J, yielding |J|=L1+L2−2π—thereby matching the paper’s claim and filling in the omitted details. No substantive contradiction found.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
Proposition 3 is correct and its geometric idea is compelling. The current proof sketch is terse; including a short construction of the interval of shifts and its length would materially improve readability and remove any ambiguity. The result is well-placed in the paper’s narrative and directly supports later applications.