Back to search
2107.06271

Structural Identifiability of Series-Parallel LCR Systems

Cashous Bortner, Seth Sullivant

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that a two-type series–parallel LCR network is locally identifiable iff the number of non-monic coefficients equals the number of parameters (Theorem 1.1), deducing RL via viscoelastic results and RC via duality, and establishing LC by a dedicated alternating-shape factorization and a full-rank matrix argument (Theorem 6.9) . The candidate solution, while reaching the same headline equivalence, relies on a “peeling lemma” based on Euclidean division of impedance/admittance that contains algebraic mistakes (notably for a series-added capacitor) and unjustified structural claims (e.g., that the number of coefficients increases by exactly one at every leaf addition, which is contradicted by the LC tables) . It also asserts an incorrect equivalence between a network and its same-type collapsed reduction. Hence the paper’s result stands, but the model’s proof is flawed.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript rigorously settles the two-type series–parallel case. RL is handled via a known viscoelastic result and RC by duality; LC is addressed with an original, well-structured approach exploiting alternating shapes and a generic invertibility argument. The exposition is clear and self-contained enough for readers familiar with linear systems and circuits. Minor editorial improvements would further enhance readability, but the core results are correct and significant within this niche.