2107.05077
Model order reduction methods for geometrically nonlinear structures: a review of nonlinear techniques
Cyril Touzé, Alessandra Vizzaccaro, Olivier Thomas
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper states and summarizes the quadratic normal-form mapping for conservative second-order systems, giving explicit second-order coefficients âij, b̂ij, ĉij, α̂ij, β̂ij, γ̂ij in terms of the resolvents [(ωi±ωj)^2 M − K]^{-1}G(φi, φj), with ĉij = 0, α̂ij = 0, β̂ij = 0, and γ̂ij = ((ωj+ωi)/ωj)Ψ̂(P)ij + ((ωj−ωi)/ωj)Ψ̂(N)ij, exactly as in the candidate solution. These formulas appear explicitly in Eqs. (47)–(48) of the review (derived from [214, 298]), alongside the same near-identity mapping X, Y in terms of R, S (Eqs. (45)–(46)) and rely on the same non-resonance (no second-order internal resonance) assumption for invertibility of (ωi±ωj)^2M − K. The symmetry of the quadratic force tensor G (hence G(φi, φj) = G(φj, φi)) is also assumed in the paper and used by the model. Therefore, the model’s derivation and final expressions coincide with the paper’s stated results and underlying assumptions, notationally and conceptually.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The section audited presents a correct and concise summary of the quadratic normal-form mapping for conservative systems. The formulas align with standard homological-equation derivations and are consistent with potential-based symmetry and non-resonance conditions. The candidate solution independently reproduces the same results, reinforcing confidence in correctness.