Back to search
2107.04346

Generalization of the Change of Variables Formula with Applications to Residual Flows

Niklas Koenen, Marvin N. Wright, Peter Maaß, Jens Behrmann

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 4 states and (essentially) proves the CVF for L-diffeomorphisms, yielding pf(x) = pZ(f^{-1}(x)) |det J f^{-1}(x)| almost everywhere, by removing null sets so the restriction is a diffeomorphism and then applying the standard CVF; see the definition of L-diffeomorphism and Theorem 4 with proof in the main text and Appendix A (e.g., Definition 2 and Theorem 4; proof lines leading to eqs. (8)–(11)) . The candidate solution proves the same result by a patchwise change-of-variables argument on countably many local inverse charts and careful disjointization, avoiding any set-theoretic slippage. The only issue we found in the paper is the asserted set equality f^{-1}(B) \ NZ = f^{-1}(B \ NX) (eq. (9)), which need not hold absent an assumption like f(NZ) ⊆ NX; however, this can be fixed with a subset relation plus a measure-zero correction, leaving the main theorem intact . Hence both are correct; the model’s proof is different (more granular) and fully resolves the technical point.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper clearly formulates L-diffeomorphisms and extends the CVF to this setting, which is mathematically clean and practically relevant for flows with non-smooth activations. The core argument is standard and correct once negligible sets are removed. A minor set-theoretic equality in Appendix A should be weakened to an inclusion with an accompanying null-set argument. With this correction, the result is sound and the exposition is strong.