Back to search
2107.01888

Complex and Projective Billiards

C. Fierobe

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The uploaded paper proves exactly the two statements under audit (Theorem 3.51): in the plane, every C∞ 3‑reflective local projective billiard is right‑spherical; in dimensions d ≥ 3, no C∞ 3‑pseudo‑reflective local projective billiard exists. The planar part is obtained by first proving in the complex analytic category that 3‑reflectivity forces the classical boundaries to be lines and hence the billiard to be right‑spherical (Proposition 3.56 and Theorem 3.71), and then passing from C∞ to analytic via Pfaffian systems (Section 3.3.5) . The higher‑dimensional non‑existence is proved via a complex version (Theorem 3.82) and planarization arguments (Lemma 3.84), implying hyperplanarity (Lemma 3.83) and a central‑pencil rigidity that leads to contradiction (Lemma 3.86) . The candidate solution outlines a different, pencil‑identity based proof sketch in the plane, arriving at the same classification, and gives a qualitative dimension‑counting argument for d ≥ 3; it cites Fierobe for full details and is consistent with the paper’s conclusions. The converse (right‑spherical is 3‑reflective) is also established in the paper (Proposition 3.10) .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The work gives a sharp classification of 3-reflective planar projective billiards and a nonexistence result in higher dimensions. The proofs combine complexification, singular analytic distributions, and Pfaffian systems in a coherent way. The exposition is largely clear, though some arguments (especially in the analytic-to-smooth passage and the higher-dimensional section) could benefit from brief roadmaps and additional reminders of key definitions. Overall, the results are correct and significant for the field of projective and complex billiards.