2106.11413
A Note on the Interpretation of Distributed Delay Equations
Philip Doldo, Jamol Pender
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Note/Short/Other
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper explicitly distinguishes sample-averaging of solutions to a random-delay DDE from the distributed-delay DDE that averages the right-hand-side operator, deriving for the discrete case v_R'(t) = α∑_i p_i v_i(t−Δ_i) and v_D'(t) = α∑_i p_i v_D(t−Δ_i), and emphasizing that these are different objects (averaging solutions vs averaging operators) . The candidate solution reproduces the same logic, but adds standard well-posedness and regularity assumptions (method of steps; absolute continuity; SLLN) and explicitly notes when the two coincide only in special cases. Hence, both are correct with essentially the same proof structure.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} note/short/other
\textbf{Justification:}
A concise, well-motivated clarification that sampling a random delay (quenched heterogeneity across realizations) is not equivalent to a distributed delay (a convex combination of delay operators acting on the same state). The discrete case exposition is clean and correct. Minor adjustments would enhance rigor and interpretative guidance (assumptions, right-derivative at t=0, and a remark on degenerate coincidences).