2106.06246
ODD INDEX OF THE AMENDED POTENTIAL IMPLIES LINEAR INSTABILITY
Yanxia Deng, Shuqiang Zhu
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 1 (odd nullity or odd Morse index of B implies JB is linearly unstable) is stated and proved correctly, with two independent arguments—via spectral flow/relative Morse index and via an elementary invariant-subspace approach . The candidate solution’s Step 1 (odd nullity forces a non-semisimple zero eigenvalue) is correct. However, Step 2 incorrectly asserts that M(B) odd forces det B < 0 and hence spectral instability, overlooking the case ν(B) > 0 where det B = 0. The paper explicitly provides spectrally stable counterexamples with M(B) odd (e.g., B = diag{−2, −1, 1, −1, 0, 0}) . Thus the model’s claim “A cannot be spectrally stable” for odd M(B) is false in general; linear instability in that regime follows from a different mechanism (failure of semisimplicity on appropriate invariant subspaces) as shown in the paper .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The manuscript establishes a sharp and practically useful instability criterion for Hamiltonian linearizations JB with B symmetric. It offers two independent, well-written proofs and clarifies a common misconception in the literature by exhibiting counterexamples. The work is correct and clearly presented; a few minor edits to foreground key distinctions (spectral vs linear stability) would further aid readers.