Back to search
2106.06246

ODD INDEX OF THE AMENDED POTENTIAL IMPLIES LINEAR INSTABILITY

Yanxia Deng, Shuqiang Zhu

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 1 (odd nullity or odd Morse index of B implies JB is linearly unstable) is stated and proved correctly, with two independent arguments—via spectral flow/relative Morse index and via an elementary invariant-subspace approach . The candidate solution’s Step 1 (odd nullity forces a non-semisimple zero eigenvalue) is correct. However, Step 2 incorrectly asserts that M(B) odd forces det B < 0 and hence spectral instability, overlooking the case ν(B) > 0 where det B = 0. The paper explicitly provides spectrally stable counterexamples with M(B) odd (e.g., B = diag{−2, −1, 1, −1, 0, 0}) . Thus the model’s claim “A cannot be spectrally stable” for odd M(B) is false in general; linear instability in that regime follows from a different mechanism (failure of semisimplicity on appropriate invariant subspaces) as shown in the paper .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript establishes a sharp and practically useful instability criterion for Hamiltonian linearizations JB with B symmetric. It offers two independent, well-written proofs and clarifies a common misconception in the literature by exhibiting counterexamples. The work is correct and clearly presented; a few minor edits to foreground key distinctions (spectral vs linear stability) would further aid readers.