Back to search
2105.03607

Mean Subtraction and Mode Selection in Dynamic Mode Decomposition

Gowtham S Seenivasaharagavan, Milan Korda, Hassan Arbabi, Igor Mezić

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper proves that, when Z = ČΘ with Č full column rank and n ≥ r, the DMD eigenvalues with nontrivial modes coincide exactly with the Koopman eigenvalues: σ_nontriv[ČΘ, c*(ČΘ)] = σ(Λ) (Theorem 5.1), with the key mechanism supplied by Appendix D (Lemma D.2) showing that true Koopman eigenvalues yield nonzero DMD modes while spurious eigenvalues yield trivial modes . The candidate’s counterexample hinges on treating the Vandermonde power vector [1, μ, …, μ^{n−1}]^T as a right eigenvector of the companion T[c*]; in this paper’s convention, those Vandermonde rows are left eigenvectors (since (V*)^{-1} is Vandermonde), and Lemma D.2 then forbids a nonzero Koopman eigenvalue from having a trivial DMD mode, contradicting the counterexample . Thus the paper’s result stands; the model’s claimed counterexample arises from an eigenvector orientation mix-up.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript gives a rigorous, practically relevant account of mean subtraction and mode selection in DMD, and proves that, under sufficient sampling and Koopman-invariant observables, nontrivial DMD eigenvalues equal the Koopman spectrum. The arguments are clear and correct, though notation is dense. Clarifying the left/right eigenvector conventions for the companion operator would help prevent misunderstandings.