2104.02131
Political Structures and the Topology of Simplicial Complexes
Andrea Mock, Ismar Volić
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 5.18 states that if some Betti number β_n is nonzero, then P contains β_n subsets of agents (each of size at least n+2) that are not viable, and in the weighted model these subsets are not w-viable for any w; hence P itself is not w-viable for any w. The proof given selects β_n independent n-cycles and notes their vertex sets cannot be simplices because a simplex is acyclic; the weighted conclusion follows from the monotonic (downward-closed) nature of w-viability (the definitions appear in the weighted model subsection) . The paper works with reduced homology (so β_0 means components minus one), which resolves n=0 edge cases . The model’s solution gives a different, more quantitative proof via the long exact sequence of the pair (Δ, P) and a counting argument on missing faces, yielding t ≥ β_n (and for n=0, t ≥ β̃_0), where t is the number of non-viable (n+2)-subsets; this immediately implies the same qualitative conclusions and the weighted corollary. Thus both are correct, with the model providing a sharper bound not present in the paper’s sketch. The paper’s own proof sketch appears in the text adjoining Theorem 5.18 and aligns with these conclusions .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The theorem is correct and the connection between homology and political viability is insightful. The exposition is accessible to readers familiar with basic algebraic topology and offers meaningful examples. Minor improvements—explicitly stating the reduced homology convention in the theorem, clarifying distinctness of identified subsets, and optionally adding an alternative LES-based proof—would enhance precision and utility without altering the substance.