2103.12721
Strictly Decentralized Adaptive Estimation of External Fields using Reproducing Kernels
Jia Guo, Michael E. Kepler, Sai Tej Paruchuri, Haoran Wang, Andrew J. Kurdila, Daniel J. Stilwell
incompletemedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper’s Theorem 2 asserts the local squared-norm rate and a fused rate stated for the non-squared norm with exponent 2p, but the printed proof is only a sketch and even contains unresolved cross-references (“Theorem ?? and Corollary ??”), so the argument is incomplete in this version of the PDF . The candidate solution supplies the missing energy/Grönwall details and correctly derives the local squared-norm rate using the RKHS restriction–extension framework and the power function bound (leveraging properties summarized in the paper) , . However, it then claims an “equivalent” fused bound of order h^{2p} for the non-squared norm after proving a bound of that order for the squared norm—this “equivalence” is not correct (the non-squared norm would scale like h^p if the squared norm scales like h^{2p}). Thus, the model’s derivation is essentially right up to the last line, but the final equivalence statement over-claims the rate, paralleling the same notational/slip in the paper’s fused bound , .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The core ideas and results are sound and relevant, but the current document version leaves the main theorem’s proof incomplete (missing cross-references) and contains a notational slip in the fused bound (non-squared norm with rate exponent 2p). With these issues corrected and with slightly more detail for self-containment, the paper would be a solid contribution to decentralized estimation in RKHS.