Back to search
2103.12721

Strictly Decentralized Adaptive Estimation of External Fields using Reproducing Kernels

Jia Guo, Michael E. Kepler, Sai Tej Paruchuri, Haoran Wang, Andrew J. Kurdila, Daniel J. Stilwell

incompletemedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:56 AM

Audit review

The paper’s Theorem 2 asserts the local squared-norm rate and a fused rate stated for the non-squared norm with exponent 2p, but the printed proof is only a sketch and even contains unresolved cross-references (“Theorem ?? and Corollary ??”), so the argument is incomplete in this version of the PDF . The candidate solution supplies the missing energy/Grönwall details and correctly derives the local squared-norm rate using the RKHS restriction–extension framework and the power function bound (leveraging properties summarized in the paper) , . However, it then claims an “equivalent” fused bound of order h^{2p} for the non-squared norm after proving a bound of that order for the squared norm—this “equivalence” is not correct (the non-squared norm would scale like h^p if the squared norm scales like h^{2p}). Thus, the model’s derivation is essentially right up to the last line, but the final equivalence statement over-claims the rate, paralleling the same notational/slip in the paper’s fused bound , .

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} major revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The core ideas and results are sound and relevant, but the current document version leaves the main theorem’s proof incomplete (missing cross-references) and contains a notational slip in the fused bound (non-squared norm with rate exponent 2p). With these issues corrected and with slightly more detail for self-containment, the paper would be a solid contribution to decentralized estimation in RKHS.