2101.05532
ON THE QUASI-STEADY-STATE APPROXIMATION IN AN OPEN MICHAELIS–MENTEN REACTION MECHANISM
Justin Eilertsen, Marc R. Roussel, Santiago Schnell, Sebastian Walcher
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The candidate solution reproduces the paper’s key steps and results: (i) the L^2 energy estimate showing exponential attraction to the c=w(s) QSS variety with time constant (k_-1+k_2)^{-1} and asymptotic bound using v ≤ k0 on the positively invariant wedge W1 (matching Proposition 1 and eqs. (42)–(43)) ; (ii) the dimensionless qualifier ε_o = k2 eT/[K_M(k_-1+k_2)] as a uniform smallness condition justifying the open sQSSA on W1 when k2 eT > k0 (eq. (45)) , consistent with the model’s bound |c−w(s)| ≲ ε_o eT; and (iii) the error indicator δ(s) from the invariance-equation expansion, its local maximum δ_m = (27/256) (k2 eT)/(k1 K_M^2) (1−r)^4 with r=k0/(k2 eT), the endpoint value δ(0)=k0/(k1 K_M^2), and the sharp switching threshold r<0.0767 determining whether δ_m or δ(0) dominates (eqs. (51)–(54)) . The open sQSSA ṡ = k0 − (k2 eT s)/(K_M+s) is exactly the paper’s reduction (eq. (26)) . Minor presentational differences (e.g., choice of inequality constants, writing δ(s) via u=s/(s+K_M)) do not affect correctness.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
The submission aligns closely with the paper’s results and methods. It accurately reproduces the key bounds (energy estimate, time constant) and the error-indicator analysis, including the sharp switching threshold. Minor clarifications would strengthen the exposition, especially around the uniform bounds and the role of the invariant wedge.