Back to search
2101.02514

Number of Bounded Distance Equivalence Classes in Hulls of Repetitive Delone Sets

Dirk Frettlöh, Alexey Garber, Lorenzo Sadun

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The paper proves the dichotomy by constructing “deviant” and “normal” patches using Laczkovich-type discrepancy bounds and then embedding these in the hull to obtain 2^{aleph_0} many pairwise non-bde Delone sets; see Theorem 1.1 and the concluding cardinality argument in the paper’s Section 3 . The candidate solution proves the same dichotomy by a descriptive set theory route: it shows the bounded-distance-equivalence relation is F_sigma (hence Borel), uses Kuratowski–Ulam to deduce meagerness off the trivial case, and then applies Mycielski’s theorem to produce a perfect antichain. This yields the same 1-or-continuum conclusion. The approaches are different and compatible; the model’s proof is concise but needs a bit more detail for the closedness of E_M (existence of limiting M-bijections), which is standard to supply under FLC via a finite-branching compactness/diagonal argument. Overall: both correct, different proofs.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

This work establishes a sharp and conceptually satisfying dichotomy for bounded-distance equivalence in repetitive FLC Delone hulls. It uses quantitative discrepancy methods to produce a continuum of inequivalent configurations when the trivial case fails. The proof is short and self-contained, and it complements independent work via different methods. A small number of presentational tweaks would further enhance readability for non-specialists.