2101.02514
Number of Bounded Distance Equivalence Classes in Hulls of Repetitive Delone Sets
Dirk Frettlöh, Alexey Garber, Lorenzo Sadun
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Strong Field
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves the dichotomy by constructing “deviant” and “normal” patches using Laczkovich-type discrepancy bounds and then embedding these in the hull to obtain 2^{aleph_0} many pairwise non-bde Delone sets; see Theorem 1.1 and the concluding cardinality argument in the paper’s Section 3 . The candidate solution proves the same dichotomy by a descriptive set theory route: it shows the bounded-distance-equivalence relation is F_sigma (hence Borel), uses Kuratowski–Ulam to deduce meagerness off the trivial case, and then applies Mycielski’s theorem to produce a perfect antichain. This yields the same 1-or-continuum conclusion. The approaches are different and compatible; the model’s proof is concise but needs a bit more detail for the closedness of E_M (existence of limiting M-bijections), which is standard to supply under FLC via a finite-branching compactness/diagonal argument. Overall: both correct, different proofs.
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field
\textbf{Justification:}
This work establishes a sharp and conceptually satisfying dichotomy for bounded-distance equivalence in repetitive FLC Delone hulls. It uses quantitative discrepancy methods to produce a continuum of inequivalent configurations when the trivial case fails. The proof is short and self-contained, and it complements independent work via different methods. A small number of presentational tweaks would further enhance readability for non-specialists.