Back to search
2012.07569

Volume growth and topological entropy of certain partially hyperbolic systems

Dawei Yang, Yuntao Zang

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The uploaded paper’s Theorem A states that for C1 diffeomorphisms admitting a partially hyperbolic splitting with one‑dimensional center blocks, the topological entropy equals both the lim inf and the lim sup of (1/n) log ∫ maxV |det(Dfnx|V)| dx; thus the limit exists and equals h_top(f) (see the abstract and Theorem A) . The proof proceeds by (i) an upper bound h_top(f) ≤ lim inf 1/n log ∫ maxV … via Proposition 2.1 and Lemma 2.2 together with the variational principle and Katok’s spanning‑set characterization , and (ii) a lower bound h_top(f) ≥ lim sup 1/n log ∫ maxi |det(Dfnx|Fi)| dx via Lemma 2.7, Corollary 2.8, and Proposition 2.6, then bridging max over Fi to max over all subspaces with Proposition 3.1 (supported by Proposition 3.2) to conclude equality and existence of the limit . By contrast, the candidate solution mis-states the upper bound as a lim sup (it is a lim inf in Proposition 2.1) and, more critically, asserts a two‑sided, n‑uniform bounded distortion for integrals of An over Bowen balls (Step 2), citing Lemma 2.7. Lemma 2.7 provides only an upper bound, not a two‑sided comparability, and the paper explicitly builds the lower‑bound direction by a different mechanism (Corollary 2.4/2.8 and Proposition 2.6), avoiding any uniform lower bound on Bowen balls . Hence the paper’s argument is coherent and correct as written, while the candidate’s proof relies on unsupported claims and incorrect citations.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The paper proves a sharp integral formula for topological entropy in a significant C1 partially hyperbolic setting with multi 1D centers, extending the precise Kozlovski-type relationship known in the C∞ class to a robust dominated-splitting context. The argument is technically careful, combining new uniform volume-growth estimates over dynamical balls with a uniform comparison principle showing that the dominated, noncontracting sum realizes the asymptotic maximal subspace volume growth. The exposition is concise; a few explanatory remarks and cross-references (especially around Proposition 3.2 and the use of Oseledets on Grassmannians) would enhance readability, but the results appear correct and of interest to researchers in smooth dynamics and partial hyperbolicity.