Back to search
2010.12385

Resonances in Hyperbolic Dynamics

Stéphane Nonnenmacher

correctmedium confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The uploaded paper states and sketches the pressure-gap result: if the trapped set KE is a hyperbolic repeller with P(1/2)<0, then for any ε>0 and C>0 there are no resonances in R(E,Ch,(|P(1/2)|−ε)h) (Theorem 2) . Its proof outline uses a nonselfadjoint twist (complex deformation plus anisotropic weights), an Ehrenfest-time decomposition into words, a one-step hyperbolic dispersive gain ∼(Ju)−1/2, and thermodynamic formalism to control sums by e^{T(P(1/2)+ε)} . The model’s solution proves the same statement with a complex absorbing potential instead of complex deformation but follows the same core mechanism (weighted propagator, hyperbolic dispersion, Ehrenfest-time calculus, pressure control, Laplace transform for the resolvent). Differences are technical (CAP vs. complex deformation), not conceptual; the logical steps align with the paper’s sketch.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

Both the paper and the model solution deliver the same pressure-gap conclusion under identical dynamical hypotheses. The paper’s proof sketch and the model’s CAP-based derivation use the same anisotropic-weight and Ehrenfest-time hyperbolic dispersive mechanism. Minor clarifications about the precise geometric setup at infinity (complex deformation vs. CAP), the scope of Egorov’s theorem after conjugation, and the partition/coding assumptions would strengthen completeness.