Back to search
2010.04788

A NEW DEGREE OF FREEDOM FOR OPINION DYNAMICS MODELS: THE ARBITRARINESS OF SCALES

Dino Carpentras, Alejandro Dinkelberg, Michael Quayle

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The paper explicitly proves MG(e^S) = e(MA(S)) and notes the analogous equivalence for MH via h(x)=1/x, establishing that MA, MG, and MH are conjugate under scale transforms; it also shows MA’s affine equivariance and MG’s failure under linear rescaling, and gives MG’s power-rescaling invariance MG(β x^n)=β[MG(x)]^n, thereby refuting the idea of a single universally best scale . The candidate solution follows the same algebraic conjugacy and invariance arguments and reaches the same conclusions, with a minor slip claiming MG(0,1) is undefined (it is defined and equals 0 on [0,1]).

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

Both the paper and the candidate solution correctly establish conjugacies between MA, MG, and MH, characterize invariances under rescaling, and negate the possibility of a single universal scale. The arguments are straightforward and consistent. Minor clarifications about domains (positivity for log/inversion) and boundary behavior (zeros) would prevent misinterpretation and strengthen applicability.