2010.04788
A NEW DEGREE OF FREEDOM FOR OPINION DYNAMICS MODELS: THE ARBITRARINESS OF SCALES
Dino Carpentras, Alejandro Dinkelberg, Michael Quayle
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- math.DS
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper explicitly proves MG(e^S) = e(MA(S)) and notes the analogous equivalence for MH via h(x)=1/x, establishing that MA, MG, and MH are conjugate under scale transforms; it also shows MA’s affine equivariance and MG’s failure under linear rescaling, and gives MG’s power-rescaling invariance MG(β x^n)=β[MG(x)]^n, thereby refuting the idea of a single universally best scale . The candidate solution follows the same algebraic conjugacy and invariance arguments and reaches the same conclusions, with a minor slip claiming MG(0,1) is undefined (it is defined and equals 0 on [0,1]).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
Both the paper and the candidate solution correctly establish conjugacies between MA, MG, and MH, characterize invariances under rescaling, and negate the possibility of a single universal scale. The arguments are straightforward and consistent. Minor clarifications about domains (positivity for log/inversion) and boundary behavior (zeros) would prevent misinterpretation and strengthen applicability.