Back to search
2009.01911

Numerical differentiation of noisy data: A unifying multi-objective optimization framework

Floris van Breugel, J. Nathan Kutz, Bingni W. Brunton

correcthigh confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The paper introduces the loss L = RMSE(trapz(ẋ̂(Φ)) + μ, y) + γ TV(ẋ̂(Φ)) for parameter selection without ground truth and specifies μ via Eq. (6) and γ via an empirical heuristic (Eq. (8)) while advocating TVRJ solved in sliding windows and practical optimizers such as CVXPY/MOSEK . The candidate solution formalizes and proves key steps: (i) derives the unique optimal μ as the sample mean residual; (ii) gives mild conditions guaranteeing existence of a minimizer over Φ; (iii) writes an explicit convex TVRJ program with KKT conditions and existence; and (iv) interprets the paper’s heuristic log γ = −1.6 log f − 0.71 log dt − 5.1 (Eq. (8)) . There is a small sign/normalization typo in the paper’s μ definition (Eq. (6)) that the model corrects; otherwise, the paper’s framework and the model’s derivations agree in substance.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

A solid, practically valuable contribution that unifies parameter selection for numerical differentiation without ground truth and demonstrates broad applicability. The framework is clear and empirically validated across methods and datasets. Minor issues (a small typo in the offset formula, missing formal assumptions, and lack of an explicit TVRJ formulation) can be remedied with brief edits or an appendix.