Back to search
2007.08043

Dynamical Zeta Functions in the Nonorientable Case

Yonah Borns-Weil, Shu Shen

correcthigh confidence
Category
Not specified
Journal tier
Specialist/Solid
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The paper proves (i) meromorphic continuation of the Ruelle zeta for Axiom A flows without orientability assumptions by introducing a twisted trace/determinant identity on i_V=0 forms tensored with the orientation line o(E^s) and reducing to basic sets (Theorem 1, Proposition 1.4; see the stated factorization ζ_R = ∏ ζ_{K,k}^{(−1)^{k+dim E^s}}) and (ii) for 3D contact Anosov Reeb flows with nonorientable E^s, ord_{λ=0} ζ_R = b_1(o(E^s)) via Res^0(0)=Res^2(0)=0 and an explicit identification Res^1(0) ≅ H^1(M; o(E^s)) with semisimplicity at 0 proved directly (equations (18)–(19), Propositions 3.4, 3.6, 3.8–3.9) . The candidate solution reaches the same conclusions: (A) by spectral decomposition into basic sets and Pollicott’s meromorphy for each basic set, and (B) by the microlocal determinant identity, contact cancellations m_2(0)=m_0(0), H^0(M;o(E^s))=0, and the Dang–Rivière identification Res^1(0) ≅ H^1(M;o(E^s)). The proofs differ in method but agree on statements and key intermediate identities; no substantive logical conflicts were found.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions

\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid

\textbf{Justification:}

This short note cleanly extends microlocal proofs of meromorphy to nonorientable bundles and provides a neat computation of the zero-order for 3D contact Anosov Reeb flows with nonorientable stable bundle. The arguments are correct and direct, and the treatment of the orientation line and semisimplicity at zero is especially clear. I recommend minor revisions for small expository enhancements and bibliographic context.