2007.05339
QUADRATIC RESPONSE AND SPEED OF CONVERGENCE OF INVARIANT MEASURES IN THE ZERO-NOISE LIMIT.
Stefano Galatolo, Hugo Marsan
correctmedium confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper proves that for a C^8 expanding circle map T and additive i.i.d. noise with kernel ρ ∈ BV having zero mean and variance σ^2, the stationary densities h_δ of L_δ = ρ_δ ∗ L_T admit a second-order expansion: ∥(h_δ − h_0)/δ^2 − (σ^2/2)(Id − L_T)^{-1} h_0''∥_{W^{1,1}} → 0 (Theorem 1) , with L_δ and ρ_δ defined as in (7)–(8) . The proof in the paper proceeds via abstract linear/quadratic response results, verifying hypotheses including a uniform Lasota–Yorke inequality and resolvent boundedness for L_T on W^{k,1} (Proposition 7 and Lemma 8) , and showing the second-order expansion of the noise operator applied to h_0 (Proposition 14) . The model’s solution reaches the same conclusion by a direct resolvent-based expansion: it expands K_δ to second order with an O(δ^3) remainder, uses h_δ − h_0 = (Id − L_δ)^{-1}(L_δ − L_T)h_0, controls the remainder via uniform bounds on (Id − L_δ)^{-1}, and then replaces (Id − L_δ)^{-1} with (Id − L_T)^{-1} using the resolvent identity and an O(δ^2) bound on (L_δ − L_T)g for suitable g. This argument is consistent with the paper’s assumptions and results. Thus both the paper and the model are correct; the approaches differ (abstract response theory vs. an explicit resolvent manipulation).
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The paper establishes a sharp and explicit quadratic response formula for invariant densities under small additive noise for smooth expanding maps. The approach is rigorous and grounded in a general response framework, with careful verification of technical hypotheses. The result is both correct and significant, clarifying and extending prior conjectures. Clarity could be improved in the organizational flow of the assumptions and by adding small explanatory remarks, but overall the presentation is solid.