2006.13162
Discrete correlations of order 2 of generalised Rudin–Shapiro sequences: a combinatorial approach
Irène Marcovici, Thomas Stoll, Pierre-Adrien Tahay
correcthigh confidence
- Category
- Not specified
- Journal tier
- Specialist/Solid
- Processed
- Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM
- arXiv Links
- Abstract ↗PDF ↗
Audit review
The paper defines generalised Rudin–Shapiro sequences via a difference matrix and proves two main results: (i) the discrepancy bound 1/N |#{0 ≤ n < N: u_{n+r} − u_n = g} − 1/|G|| ≤ rk(1+log_k N)/N (Theorem 2.10), and (ii) the limiting joint distribution lim_{N→∞} (1/N) #{0 ≤ n < N: (u_n,u_{n+r})=(i,j)} = 1/|G|^2 (Theorem 2.12). Both statements and their proofs are clearly presented and rely on a combinatorial “fibre” argument plus uniform letter frequencies for primitive morphic sequences . By contrast, the candidate solution’s Fourier/packet-cancellation approach makes a crucial, unjustified cancellation: it invokes “row orthogonality” of the character matrix R_χ (which follows from the difference-matrix condition) but then sums over the row index (varying x_L) with a fixed column h. The difference-matrix property yields orthogonality when summing over columns h for fixed rows i≠j, not when summing over rows with a fixed column. Hence the asserted top-level packet cancellation, and the O(rk) remainder bound that follows, are not justified. The paper’s results (Propositions 3.3–3.4 for (i), Proposition 3.7 for (ii)) are correct and complete using the fibre method .
Referee report (LaTeX)
\textbf{Recommendation:} minor revisions
\textbf{Journal Tier:} specialist/solid
\textbf{Justification:}
The work provides a clear, combinatorial pathway to order-2 correlation results for generalised Rudin–Shapiro sequences defined by difference matrices, obtaining explicit log(N)/N bounds and uniform pair-distribution limits. The arguments are elementary yet rigorous and improve conceptual understanding compared to exponential-sum methods. Minor improvements in exposition would further benefit readers.