Back to search
2006.09601

Positive Entropy Implies Chaos Along Any Infinite Sequence

Wen Huang, Jian Li, Xiangdong Ye

correctmedium confidence
Category
math.DS
Journal tier
Strong Field
Processed
Sep 28, 2025, 12:55 AM

Audit review

The paper proves Theorem 1.1 for amenable G-actions via a measure-theoretic route: variational principle to pick an ergodic positive-entropy measure, disintegration over the Pinsker σ-algebra, relatively independent self-joining, a relative independence (Sinai-type) theorem (Theorem 2.6), two carefully constructed partitions on X×X (Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3), and a Mycielski upgrade to obtain a dense Mycielski scrambled set in a typical fibre (Theorem 3.1), from which the topological statement follows . In contrast, the candidate solution’s Step 5 posits a two-atom partition {B0,B1} of X with dist(B0,B1)>4δ and with fibrewise measures 1/2, which generally does not exist on a connected compact metric space; the paper avoids this by working on X×X and by constructing product-space partitions tied to Δr, not separated partitions of X (see the construction of α and β in Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3) . Moreover, the model omits the crucial step of selecting finite sets Fm from the tail of the prescribed sequence {si} so that FF−1 avoids a finite warm-up set K (as guaranteed by Theorem 2.6), which is essential for establishing the needed conditional independence along the sequence . The rest of the model broadly follows the paper’s scheme (Pinsker disintegration, relative independence, Mycielski) but lacks these key technical details and uses a flawed separation assumption.

Referee report (LaTeX)

\textbf{Recommendation:} no revision

\textbf{Journal Tier:} strong field

\textbf{Justification:}

The manuscript establishes a compelling and robust strengthening of the link between positive entropy and Li–Yorke chaos, valid along any infinite sequence for amenable group actions. The proof is carefully constructed using standard, powerful tools (Pinsker disintegration, relative independence) and avoids delicate geometric assumptions on X by working on the product space. The exposition is clear and the logical flow is convincing.